IPL 2025

Osman Samiuddin – Is cricket ready for a Saudi Arabia-backed Grand Slam T20 circuit?

The plans for a new Grand-Slam style circuit of T20 tournaments, with the financial support of Saudi Arabia, based on a plan developed by players’ associations, represents a daring attempt to foray into cricket by forces outside the closed shop which is traditional cricket governance.

But for all the influx that the revelation of the plan has created, it remains to be seen how far it will go if it does not cooperate, or at least the interest, the organization which holds the key to the largest cricket market: the BCCI.

Talking about a Saudi entry into the cricket is not new, of course. It has been an element for two years, with only the precise input mode a variable: a participation in an IPL franchise, an entirely new league, an unpertified control but basically of the sport, make your choice. Meanwhile, the real entry of the country was much more progressive. Sponsorship at IPL, a partnership linked to the ICC and, more recently and certainly on even the most important, as a host of the IPL.

It is time for some to support, given its impact on other major sports. It is always a football nation – a major Asian force – but it is its incursions in boxing, tennis, F1, MMA and golf that reported its broader intentions to become a sporting force.

For the moment, there are few details to these plans. Seven to eight teams from all over the world, playing four tournaments in one year, each tournament was planning to last 10-12 days. These are early sketches with few details on how these tournaments will adapt to what is already a calendar that bursts to seams. To be successfully incorporated, he would almost certainly need to cause collateral damage, most likely to certain international cricket formats, such as bilateral ODIs without context and T20is. What countries will be involved? And what teams will they send? The national sides, as it seems to be a suggestion, or those of the T20 franchise leagues already established (and therefore, is it a renewal of the Champions League?), Or another geographic representation of an elite?

As significant as the involvement of SRJ sporting investments, the SAUDI SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND SUDIBER Branch is that of Australian Cricket ‘Association (ACA) and the World Cricket’ Association (WCA). The idea would be an original idea of ​​Neil Maxwell, of the former NSW and Victoria versatile and former member of the Board of Directors of the ACA who is now an eminent manager of the players. He has been preparing for at least last year, if not earlier. ACA confirmed the Age That it was at the origin of the idea: “The early interest of the ACA to explore this concept is motivated by the desire to develop and normalize the collective negotiation of best practices and an international model of compensation for the gender equivalent for the male and female cricket organs. And to develop competition creating a value for the distribution of the game of crickets for all nations.”

The WCA, which pleads for the change on the broken international calendar for several years, is supposed to take the lead on the level now. He has not made any comments on the question, but is busy for the moment with something that is not entirely unrelated: a complete examination of the global structure of the game, the results of which should be released imminently. Is more cricket the answer? No, but perhaps the first tournaments led by players in the cricket calendar, a bit like the ATP of tennis, the east (although the tour is currently the subject of a trial by players).

It is not unimportant. The players are at the strongest end of the impossibilities of this calendar and have expressed the change. Given the associations of players involved, some of the main players in the world will be behind it. But it will not be exactly like ATP, because the plans also consider participation for the ICC. According to some accounts, Danny Townsend, the director general of SRJ, would have interacted with Jay Shah on the sidelines of the IPL and mentioned auction, although briefly, these plans. This suggests that Saudi Arabia does not want to make the type of turbulent and disturbing entry into the cricket it has in golf, for example, where it created a parallel circuit.

Until now, the speech has been that the circuit income will be divided into a formulation between SRJ, players’ associations and the ICC. ACA’s declaration acknowledges that gains will find a way back to guiding bodies, in the hope that test cricket can be subsidized.

This turnover, of course, will be the thing because it is not clear how and how much such a league can generate. The IPL aside, how many leagues have really brought money in difficulty? And there are many signs that the cricket diffusion rights market may have reached a peak and that the ecosystem is now under stress, as suggested by the current tension between the ICC and the Jiostar for their rights agreement. The Saudis can put the kind of money to start a league, but what are the prospects to do it – and much more?

And, of course, the reality is that, for this to happen, the circuit will need Indian players. This is why Shah was sought at IPL auction, given that he was secretary of the BCCI at the time, as well as the elected president of the ICC. Few of this magnitude can happen successfully in cricket without shah – or BCCI – buy it. And why would the BCCI buy a concept which, in its greatest ambitions, actually competes on IPL?

The first noises of another great council were an extreme skepticism. The director general of the ECB, Richard Gould Age unequivocal “there is no significance or request for such an idea”, embraces, without a doubt, by the injection of a private equity private equity of half a million books in the hundred. Other member advice could be influenced by the prospect of another flow of income, but the main thing is that if the BCCI is not on board the plan, a large diffusion agreement becomes all the more difficult.

One last point to think is the idea of ​​WCA and the ICC working together. The WCA has become more and more – and rightly so – frustrated by the way the game is managed by the ICC and its members. When he launched his examination in the structure, President Heath Mills said that he had “lost hope” that the leaders of the game could establish a “clear and coherent structure” sheltering both international cricket and national leagues.

The relationship has sometimes been an opponent. A number of full members, including the BCCI and the PCB, do not even have players’ associations. The ICC and the WCA recently flocked to the former user of players’ image rights. This has led WCA to sign a long-term agreement with Winners Alliance (a subsidiary of the Professional Professional Tennis Association of Novak-Djokovic, the organization currently pursuing ATP), which will negotiate collective trade agreements for players who are members of the associations of players affiliated to WCA. A league led by players would be a victory for WCA, but how easy it will be when many of these players remain under contract with the various member advice that constitute the ICC?

It is almost inevitable that the Saudi money will enter the game. It has divided into most other important sports and since the attraction of Indian tourism remains a key goal, cricket is an obvious game. It is just far from being sure that it is so.

Osman Samuddin is editor -in -chief at Espncricinfo

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button